> On Tuesday 04 May 2004 11:56, Niall O Broin wrote:
>>> And that "boilerplate EULA" is indeed interesting, because it clearly
>> states that you can redistribute RHEL, with the exception of commercial
>> redistribution of RedHat's trademarked elements.
>> Slightly OT, but why would anyone run RHEL unless they wanted RH support?
> If you don't want support, isn't it more sensible to run Fedora?
>
No. The beauty of RHEL is that every quarter new ISO's are released
containing _only_ bugfixes from well tested code. Fedora on the other hand
is bleeding edge. i.e.: a hippy distro like debian or slackware :--0
Obviously you dont have to wait for every quarter as each package can be
installed manually etc.
p.s.: I'm changing my domain name coz its _really_ shite.
It will eventually be called www.fishrescue.org. I shall be providing a
goldfish/aquarium/pond fish rescue service. So if you have a goldfish in a
weebowl, mail me and I'll put him in a far better home.
Conor Wynne
Dublin
Irlande.
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
