Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> I seem to remember in a late night meander that "new" is actually when
> you get right down to it, some sort of overloaded call to "malloc" and
> "delete" is some sort of overloaded call to "free".
>> Assuming that's true, what would be the effect of linking against
> Electric Fence here, with it's replacements for malloc and free?
>> My instinct tells me that, the libc malloc & free if overloaded at the
> C++ compiler level, *won't* be replaced, but, I might be wrong.
http://freshmeat.net/projects/efence/?topic_id=47
Hmm, I should probably rtfm or have coffee x2 before posting/speaking/touching
a keyboard in the morning.
--
Bryan O'Donoghue
Embedded Software Engineer
Europlex Technologies Ltd
Clonshaugh Business & Technology Park
Dublin 17
Ireland
T:+353 (0) 1 2500500
F:+353 (0) 1 2500590
E:bryano at euoplex.ie
W:www.europlex.ie
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
