On Tuesday 25 May 2004 21:30, Paul Jakma wrote:
> > + extended partitions should only be be the last in each table
> > (and indeed, in the last (4th) slot of the MBRs table);
>> Hmm, really? I've often created extend partitions in between primary
> partitions.
Why?
The OP said you _should_ put logical partitions in hda4, and I agree.
Disk Druid didn't used to allow you to add a further primary partition
once you had added an extended partition -
I don't know if that is still the case.
I iaagine your method would cause chaos if you deleted a logical partition.
> > + there is an indeterminate number of logical partitions per
> > extended;
>> There may be limits in how many an OS supports though, cant remember
> if Linux has such a limit. It definitely had a limit in how many
> partitions can be on a disk (least for scsi disks - was limited to 15
> - probably still is).
I came across this with RedHat 9 a year or so ago.
I had sda15, and the system objected.
When I enquired (I had 3 months free advice)
I was told that RH only allowed 15 partitions.
I tried pointing out that 15 is <=15, but didn't get anywhere.
When I got rid of sda15 the problem went away.
I must say I thought this was a RedHat rule rather than Linux.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!