[ILUG] GPL violation?

[Paul Jakma]

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Paul Jakma wrote:

> Also, I'm not sure, but 2d of the LGPL possibly disallows one from 
> distributing a work including the LGPL work (or derived work) if 
> the entire work is not LGPL. But you'd need a lawyer to figure that 
> one out.

ah, nm me.. when I scrolled down a bit more to section 6 of the LGPL, 
i saw it covered works that link with LGPL libs. co-distribution is 
allowed, however they are required to supply the licence and inform 
the user of the LGPL status of those parts of the distribution..

or whatever..

anyway: Brent R. Matzelle's and Chris Ryan's copyrights are being 
violated it seems.

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma	paul at clubi.ie	paul at jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
One man's Mede is another man's Persian.
 		-- George M. Cohan