On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Declan Grady wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> My tcp_rmem has the values : 4096 87380 174760
Yep, that's the default.
> From your note above, (512/8)*1.2 gives me 76.8 .. I guess this
> should then become 76.8*1024 to give 78643 ?
Right.
> .. so I should leave it as it is ?
You could try increasing it actually. Depends on how much RAM you
have really. You need at least (bandwidth*latency[1]) for TCP to be
able to make full use of a link, you need more to be able to
accomodate retransmits/errors.
So, you could try bumping that middle value up a bit (RAM
permitting), which might help performance a bit if/when your sat-link
experiences congestion.
Google for TCP bandwidth-delay product for (vast amounts of)
background information.
> Or am I on the wrong track ?
>> Thanks,
> Declan
1. link latency - not RTT as ping measures. But in your case, the RTT
figures you get will likely be dominated by sat-link latency, so your
ping times are probably equivalent to your sat-link latency.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul at clubi.iepaul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
One can never consent to creep when one feels an impulse to soar.
-- Helen Keller
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!