LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
Email to...
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

[ILUG] [comp.os.linux.hardware] Graphics card fully supported by Open Source drivers!

[ILUG] [comp.os.linux.hardware] Graphics card fully supported by Open Source drivers!

Liam Bedford lbedford at lbedford.org
Fri Nov 26 10:15:40 GMT 2004


John Madden wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On (25/11/04 22:10), Paul Jakma didst pronounce:
> 
>> John Madden wrote:
[snip]
>>>My point : while this machine isn't exactly bleeding edge, it's 
>>>certainly cutting edge, and everything in it is supported.
>>
>>No, that hardware is quite *badly* supported by Linux - because of 
>>the idiocy of NVidias' policies on specs.
>>
> 
> When you say badly supported, do you mean by open source drivers, or
> just in general? I see "supported" as meaning "it works". I mean, most
> hardware on sale now is "supported" by Windows, meaning it works. But
> you won't get the source to the drivers.
> 
> I'm happy enough that companies like NVidia are even recognising that
> Linux user's should be supported aswell. Whether that means releasing
> specs or writing drivers is up to the company.
> 
By producing binary only, broken, unpatchable drivers? The more people 
buy from these people, the more they think this is the way to go.

And what are you going to do if you decide to run a 64 bit OS on your 
AMD64? Do Nvidia provide 64 bit linux binary only drivers yet? Do they 
work well?

What would you do if you went to a powerpc box and wanted to run linux?

> 
>>I installed FC2 Linux on an SMP Opteron box a few months ago, 
>>and I had no issues at all. SATA: no problems (Silicon Image 3114, 
>>they gave docs to Jeff), NIC: no problems at all (Broadcom Tigon3, 
>>they gave docs to Dave Miller).
>>
>>You picked probably the worst chipset to run linux on.
>>
> 
> I don't see it that way. Certainly I could've picked a better one, but
> when the hardware is supported (my view of the word), I'm happy. In the
> end, I still want a working desktop.
> 
> 
>>>Hell, Linux had AMD64 support before Microsoft, so early A64 
>>>machines would've depended on Linux (or maybe some of the other 
>>>unix clones -- don't really know) to run in 64-bit mode.
>>
>>Linux ran on AMD64 before there was ever silicon. AMD provided AMD64 
>>simulators to help porting effort. I think NetBSD and Linux were the 
>>only OSes to run on AMD64 when it was first released.
>>
> 
> My point exactly, so I don't see Linux being as far behind as others do.
> 
You can't get a directX 9 class video card that works with open source 
linux drivers, as far as I can see. This is my major bugbear. I'd like 
to get a new video card, but I don't want to buy one I can only use 
properly with binary only drivers. In fact, it's entirely possible I 
wouldn't be able to use those binary only drivers, as I run my AMD64 in 
64 bit mode.

Binary only drivers are wrong long term. They're a short term fix to the 
IP problems that Nvidia/Intel/ATI et al have.

L.



More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell