On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:11:47PM +0100, kevin lyda wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 12:44:20PM +0100, Jason Corcoran wrote:
> > For some reason the semun union is not defined in /usr/include/sys/sem.h
> >
> > Is there a reason for this?
> >
> > Is my only option to define this union myself. I have grep'd through my
> > includes and there is no definition of semun.
> >
> > Are there any links explaining why this is this way
>> the semctl manpage has a code snippit for how to define it. it is an
> unfortunate name though.
>> kevin
Kevin,
Thaks for the reply. I had noticed the definition on the man page, which is wrapped around a if def and commented that it should be defined in sys/shm.h
I was more wondering if this is a Linux / Mandrake querk or is this union normally not defined in the headers.
Thanks again
Jason
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
