On 4/27/05, Steven Satelle <ssatelle at gmail.com> wrote:
> Isnt some of this against the GPL, especially the part about people
> you pass the software onto not getting the same rights as you?
Well, I think they apply these conditions to the work covered by the
"compilation copyright", and that piece of work isn't licensed under
the GPL. According to Rick's thorough research, they then refer you
to the individual licence-files for specific packages. If those are
under the GPL, then you can distribute those specific applications
(but not the entire CD/DVD) subject to the GPL. I don't think that
the GPL's compulsory licensing requirements (i.e. if you use GPL code
in your project, project becomes GPL) apply to derivative works that
are compilations.
Equally, and I believe this has been Rick's point (now
clarified/confirmed AFAICS by examination of the SuSE licences), if
they're under a more restrictive licence, then you are bound by that
licence.
Best regards,
Michael
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
