Niall O Broin wrote:
> On 28 Apr 2005, at 15:21, PJ Wall wrote:
>>> Yep, I have no problems agreeing with you Niall, but I'm currently
>> researching a thesis in this area at the moment, and that is exactly
>> what a number of organisations are telling me.
>> We all have to remember that some decision makers in organisations
>> may not be aware of Open Source. I agree with you that this is NOT
>> an insurmountable obstacle as you say, but I also firmly believe that
>> it IS a pretty big one.
>>>> The incentives to go OSS are greatly diminished if a "critical" app
>> is not Windows compatible. Getting a similar app written can be
>> expensive and time consuming, and there are no guarantees that the
>> same functionality will be delivered. We all know about the
>> "software crisis" right?
>>>> All I'm saying I suppose is that I think organisations with limited
>> IT budgets (not to mention ROI considerations) are willing to put up
>> with all the expense, poor reliability, and hassle that proprietary
>> software brings, if the alternative is a switch to OSS that involves
>> uncertanty and writing new software from scratch.
>>> IMO what's happening here, in a lot of cases, is that Linux is gaining
> a lot of visibility, and senior people in organisations are musing
> "Hmm - maybe we could use that". They ask the question of their IT
> people who in many cases are diehard MS users and they seek something
> to reinforce their position so they say "We can't move to Linux
> because the XYZZY application is not Linux compatible" and as far as
> they're concerned, the monkey is off their back.
>> Any organisation deploying IT solutions should be evaluating those
> solutions on a cost/benefit analysis basis, taking all factors into
> account. If they were to consider a switch to Linux, one of those
> factors would be say staff training costs, which for admin. staff
> might be quite high. However, it's an awful lot easier to simply say
> mention the XYZZY factor as above, and stay where you are, than to do
> a reasoned cost benefit analysis.
>> Never underestimate the power of inertia as a determinant of human
> activity.
>>>> Niall
>Niall
Well said... I could not agree more.
This is a very accurate representation of what I am finding as I
continue researching this.
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!