On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 07:59:32PM +0200 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Brian Foster thought:
>> if you want to use split(1) ??? and there _may_
> be a better method ??? I'd suggest instead of
> blindly `split'ing the tar(1) archive, break
> it apart in-between archived files (i.e., at
> file boundaries). be sure to append `tar's
> EoA mark to each part.
>> by breaking at saved-file-boundaries, you
> reduce the Risk by eliminating at least one
> of the complicating variables: each CD is
> always a properly-formed archive. _and_,
> because each CD is essentially a complete
> archive, you don't have to first cat(1)
> all yer CDs back together into one huge
> reassembled archive .... probably a winner!
>> now, what might be a better method is to use
or what might be an even better than that method is to use mondoarchive
which {as it happens} uses both afio and cdrecord. It uses a whole lot
more too but it would, being a bare-metal disaster recovery system.
http://www.mondorescue.org
Conor
--
Conor Daly <conor.daly at oceanfree.net>
Domestic Sysadmin :-)
---------------------
Hobbiton.cod.ie
20:23:45 up 14 days, 4:45, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!