Quoting David Golden (david.golden at unison.ie):
> x64 is sooo much less obnoxious. And it's what microsoft has started
> using.
>> Is there a good reason that linux people turned their nose up at
> calling it x64?
Truth to tell, I'd personally never seen the term before, prior to
seeing your post. (I guess I don't see much Microsoft Corp. and Sun
Microsystems advertising.)
Off the top of my head:
Good: It's short.
Slightly bad: Easily confused with IA64 (but IA64 becomes less
significant with each passing day, and I say this as one of the
people who constructed the largest Itanium cluster ever, one
that achieved #2 on the Top 500 list).
A bit bad: Fails as a parallel to the very common concept of "x86".
("Huh? What Intel processor number ends in '64'?")
It's certainly a lot snappier (and less annoying to type) than "x86_64",
I'll grant you that.
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!