On Thu 14 Jul 2005 12:51, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > Advice sought: when I turned on my second-best laptop today it said
> > =========================================
> > Jul 14 11:17:41 martha kernel: hub 1-0:1.0: over-current change on port 1
> > Jul 14 11:18:12 martha last message repeated 121 times
> > Jul 14 11:19:13 martha last message repeated 244 times
> > =========================================
> > and so on.
> >
> > What sort of error message is that?
> > There should be a competition for the most useless error message,
> > or the most obscure.
>> Disclaimer : ianaue : i am not a usb expert.
Thank you Brian for dipping into your well of knowledge.
Your comments have indeed thrown a bright light on martha (my laptop).
> This is either a kernel or a hardware bug.
Sorry to be mean, but this reminds me of the time years ago
when I rang a US helpline for advice on a motherboard,
and a guy with a very slow Texas accent -
these were the days when Eircom was really Eircom,
and calls to the States cost 1000 pounds a minute -
said, "What you have there <long pause>
is either a hardware bug <longer pause> or a software bug."
> Your USB port 1, reports an over current "change" state, then the port
> is told to clear this "feature" (I'm not sure if that is analogous to
> switching it 'off forever' or just clearing it 'right now'). ie if
> "clear feature"="switch off forever" in this domain, is not immediately
> obvious to me.
OK thanks - I wasn't really clear what "over current" meant
but I guess that doesn't matter too much.
> In any case, either the clear command fails due to a software bug or
> hardware bug, or the clear command succeeds, but for whatever reason,
> the condition gets reasserted.
>> To find out for sure, remove whatever is in port 1.
Actually there is nothing in my USB port -
the hub is internal,
and there should be an internal Bluetooth connection to the hub,
but this has never worked since I bought the laptop over eBay
from a very smooth guy in Birmingham UK.
(I was going over the UK anyway,
and he treated me to a slap-up Indian meal when I collected the laptop,
which I must admit made me suspicious.
However, that was 3 years ago, and it has worked fine since.
Who needs Bluetooth anyway when we have WiFi?)
> If the error persists, upgrade to the latest vanilla kernel.
> If the error still persists... perhaps try out a 2.4...
I did actually try running a couple of kernels
(I'm not old enough to have a 2.4 kernel),
and the message was the same.
I looked back over my /var/log/messages
and the error messages seem to have started today.
Actually the only time they are very noticeable
is when booting, as the error comes up every second.
> If at that point the error still persists (sans misbehaving device in
> port 1 for all previous cases) ... then it _does_ probably mean that for
> whatever reason USB port 1, on your laptop, reports over-current change
> for no good reason... and is probably broken, somehow... due to, black
> magic... or a field effect/martians maybe.
Actually, I don't think any USB devices work on this computer anyway,
_even under Windows-2000_,
so I guess I might as well just remove the USB modules from the kernel.
[Maybe I ought to open the box, to see if there is a real bug in there,
I mean one with 6 legs.]
Who needs USB anyway, when we have PCMCIA?
The old ways are the best ways.
The whole world has gone to the dogs since Python came in.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!