> gbackup?
> well i thought dd would be the fastes since it simply dumps the whole
> disk.
> i'd imagine that the machine would be under a constant io load so i
> thought this migh perform the best.
> my hearts not set on dd
Why bother backing up the entire disk/partition?
The only thing that is important is you data.
For instance, it will most likely take you _longer_ to get you OS back off
- tape, disk, whatever - than it would to nuke the entire system & restore
from backup.
I would backup :
1. /home
2. /etc
3. parts of /var & /opt
And thats it. In this day of "broadband", you can easily get back updated
in notime. And even without "broadband", you could backup your update
packages to CD or something.
You backup "app" could be a simple tar command. It all depends on the
environment - I imagine this is for personal data.
Regards
Conor.
-------------------------------------------------
This email has been scanned for viruses by Clamav
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!