On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Nils Olofsson wrote:
>> Is there a speed difference? Maybe, but I don't notice it. Anyhow,
>> you spend so long installing packages in the background that your
>> system will probably run slower, on average.
>> All my updates compile in the background, most 99% are emerged within a
> few hours.
Funny, Debian and RPM based distro's can install software in less
than a minute. I thought Gentoo was supposed to be *faster*?
Plus, you get to either do actual /useful/ stuff with those saved
cycles or alternatively not use them and save a bit on your
electricity bill.
And that's ignoring fact that source tends to be significantly larger
than the resulting binaries built from it, and hence can be
downloaded much faster.. How long does it take to download OpenOffice
source, even with DSL? :)
Aside: I object to Gentoo users being called 'ricers'. Original
"rice-burners" (ie Japanese motorbikes, and more recently japanese
sports cars as well) actually *were* faster, more reliable and
generally better than the established competition. Gentoo is none of
those.
/me goes to bed to dream of further ways to troll gentoo users
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul at clubi.iepaul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
The minute a man is convinced that he is interesting, he isn't.
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!