LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
Email to...
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

[ILUG] Suggestions for best 64 bit Linux distro?

[ILUG] Suggestions for best 64 bit Linux distro?

Nils Olofsson lists at olofsson.tv
Wed Jun 29 15:31:27 IST 2005


On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:07 +0100, John Madden wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On (29/06/05 14:42), Nils Olofsson didst pronounce:
> > > Why bother doing any of the above? 
> > choice maybe ?
> 
> And that's what it all comes down to -- choice. What you use is your own
> choice. I don't expect anyone to tell me what's better than what I want
> to use, and I won't tell anyone else either. If a question is asked,
> it's simple to give an honest reply about how you find X for doing task
> Y. Someone else may use something different for the same task, and find
> it easier / more suitable / whatever, but that doesn't mean you have to
> change what you use.
<snip>
> This thread has degraded past even a mildly amusing,
I agree with you there.
>  or even mildly
> interesting debate on the benefits of Gentoo's packages as opposed to
> other package management systems. If people want to run Gentoo at home,
> so be it.
Its all about choice in that respect.

>  If they want to waste CPU cycles compiling every piece of
> software, again, so be it.
what else would the cpu be doing other wise :)
idleing ?
>  It's all their choice. But they have no right
> to force their "Gentoo beats all" opinion on the rest of us that _don't_
> run Gentoo. Personally, I run Debian on 2 servers, my (AMD64) desktop
> and my laptop, and I'm quite happy with it. I'm not saying everyone else
> should use, or even try, Debian. I don't care whether you do or not. I'm
> sure it has its advantages over Gentoo, and Gentoo probably has
> advantages over Debian -- it all depends on the scenario and what you
> want it to do.
Please tell me where i said "Gentoo beats all" i've never said such a
thing. 

> So, for God's sake, give up on the persistant nit-picking crap.

I've never nit picked anything, i stated the facts as i know them its up
to people to decide from there, but spreading BS about gentoo defects
this.

>  If this
> thread is to come to _any_ use at all, both sides of the argument need
> to put forward valid, substantiated arguments for their choice, or just
> shut up and let it pass. I have to say though, most of the valid
> substantiated arguments have come from the non-Gentoo crowd so far. 
What arguments are they ?
in a mixed H/W enviroment binary package managment system would be
better suited to this.
>This
> is not meant as flame-bait, and if it's picked up as such, won't be
> replied to (by me anyway). If you think your distro beats all else, then
> substantiate why. If someone disagrees, who cares! It doesn't change
> your opinion, and you have no right to change theirs.

Some of your comment are flame-bait, I've stated before "choice" give
people the facts and let them make their own mind up.

> > >  It's all done for you already in  
> > > Ubuntu or Debian.
> > so what your saying is ubuntu/debian is perfect for every situation and
> > any other way is stupid or in  "cloud-cuckoo land" ?
> 
> And this is a perfect example of bullshit. I haven't seen _anyone_ post
> _anything_ to say _any_ distro is better for every situation. What the
> previous poster _did_ say is that the packages are already built for you
> if you use Debian / Ubuntu, and asked why, if it's already done for you,
> would you do it again instead of using what's been done before? Don't
> re-invent the wheel and all that. 
people have stated that because you don't have to compile from source
and you "all get the same binary" that its a better way than source
install( its gets more testing etc) I think there are enough gentoo
users to test the vast majority server related software, and I don't
think compile from source Distos are re-inventing the wheel.
debian was compile from source afterall.

> Essentially, cut out the shite. If you've got an argument to make, then
> make it. Otherwise shut the hell up.
I'm not trying to argue with people, just trying to give my opinion.
and the facts as i know them.

> Apologies to all for the longwinded post, but this thread is getting
> boring. Guess I'm just trying to either liven it up or kill it :)
> 
> And it's obvious anyway, Debian is the best distro ;p

you see, now thats flame-bait.

> /me ducks
> 
> - -- 
> Chat ya later,
> 
> John.
> - --





More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell