On Wednesday 29 June 2005 14:16, you wrote:
> On 29 Jun 2005, at 15:20, Simon Kenyon wrote:
> > i have used to as a production server
>> What?
>> > as for the evaluation process:
> > 24 years using unix and over 10 using linux (sls, slackware, red
> > hat, suse, debian and gentoo)
>> That's not an evaluation process. That's a list of distributions.
>> Why did you pick Gentoo for a production server? Would you pick it
> if you had 10 servers to run? 100?
>> Colm
after using slackware for about 2 years, red hat for about another 2, suse for
3'ish, debian for 2 and gentoo for 2 - in my opinion, that *is* an evaluation
process
slackware had no realistic upgrade process
red hat was so non-standard (coming from a UNIX background)
suse was fine, but a bit dated
debian was good at first, but trying to stay current became very difficult
when all the lockstep'ed dependencies
which led me to gentoo (for now)
i think i've made my position very clear
i would run gentoo on any number of machines (i only have about a dozen)
if they were all the same arch (in particular CPU but also m/b) it would be a
no-brainer. with the set of the Epia-m9000's that i have i build on one and
install the binaries on the other two (using distcc and portage to do it all
pretty automagically)
regards
--
simon
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!