Conor Wynne wrote:
>>Quoting Conor Wynne (weeboy at conorwynne.com):
>>>>>>>Think its win9x your thinking of. Which is why the system had to be
>>>finger saluted if the display got corrupted. This did not happen with
>>>>No, he _is_ thinking of NT4. The graphics drivers had to be moved into
>>ring zero (kernelspace) during the beta cycle to restore performance to
>>acceptable levels, compared to NT 3.51 and prior, which ran the graphics
>>subsystem (more sensibly) in userspace.
> Ah yes, its coming back to me now, and yes I have heard those same
> arguments aswell. Good man.
It's might be worth noting that people who use monolithic kernels, don't
have an abundance of leeway in criticising a decision to move something
non-ring0 to ring0.
For shame : Graphics drivers in ring zero.
Thank god in Linux/BSD land we run our file system drivers, network
drivers, schedulers, ... in userspace...
/runs for the hills
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!