On man, 2005-03-14 at 09:20 +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> Paul Jakma wrote:
>> > SVN, with above caveats, is *way* better than CVS. You'll be really
> > happy with using SVN over CVS (if the server side stuff doesnt bother you).
> >
> > However, distributed SCM is even better. So I'm holding out hoping for
> > GNU Arch to become user-friendly. If 'svnserve' gains auth and acl
> > features i want before Arch becomes user-friendly, then I might reconsider.
>>> Hmm.
>> The thing that initially put me off of arch was, the learning curve not
> just for the other developers, but, for myself.
>
This is exactly where svk is going to be very interesting, once it is a
bit more mature. As a developer you won't have to relearn every time you
are forced to switch SCM system.
Slán leat,
Martin List-Petersen
Dublin, Eire
(contact info on --> http://www.marlow.dk/)
--
To communicate is the beginning of understanding.
-- AT&T
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
