LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
Email to...
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

[ILUG] Re: ILUG sends s/w patents briefing document to Irish MEPs

[ILUG] Re: ILUG sends s/w patents briefing document to Irish MEPs

Niall O Broin niall at linux.ie
Sun Mar 20 13:50:12 GMT 2005


On 20 Mar 2005, at 12:30, Joseph Kiniry wrote:

>> No.  Because so many patents are held on what would otherwise be 
>> termed
>> basic techniques (eg: the XOR trick to highlight an area of the 
>> screen),
>> it is extremely difficult to write unencumbered software.  The trouble
>> with the current system is that patents are held on many methods and
>> devices which are trivial yet essential.
>
> How does this contradict my point?  Even the technologies covered by 
> "basic technique" patents are easily implemented in other, innovative 
> ways.

The problem with "basic technique" patents is that they ARE so basic 
and are often NOT easily implemented in other, innovative ways. The XOR 
trick is a very good case in point (though that patent was granted in 
1978, so I presume it's expired by now) because it is so basic, obvious 
and simple to implement, and importantly when it started being used, 
very cheap in CPU cycles. I don't know if sprite based systems infringe 
that patent, because I think many of those use a hardware overlay 
plane. I do know that Autodesk was a licensee of that patent for 
AutoCAD, and I imagine other CAD vendors and other large visible 
targets using this idea were too.

> Note that I *do* think that the existing US patent system is extremely 
> broken, particularly with regards to software and business patents.

Indeed - one click comes to mind straight away. I grew up as an 
engineer being told that a patent was on the implementation of an idea, 
not on an idea, but those halcyon days are gone.
>
> History has shown that existing trivial patents are voided once they 
> reach the courts or once an enormous corporation forces the USPTO into 
> a review. Of course, this is often a quite costly process.

Exactly. And in the U.S., where in the majority of cases AIUI each 
party pays its own court costs, simply being threatened with a court 
case will make most companies cave in, because even if you win the 
court case, you lose financially. I wonder what's the general practice 
in patent infringement cases in Ireland, where in general in civil 
cases the losing party pays the costs of both parties.


Niall




More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell