On 22 Mar, 2005, at 7:47, Paul O'Malley wrote:
> Gavin McCullagh wrote:
>>>> Joseph Kiniry wrote:
>>>>>>> On 21 Mar, 2005, at 21:03, Paul O'Malley wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Joseph Kiniry wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, how often do you believe that serious modern "for profit"
>>>>> software development does not require significant capital?
>>>>>>>>> I believe the following to be examples of serious modern and for
>>>> profit software development.
>>>>>>>> (A) Iona
>>>> (B) Mandrakesoft
>>>> (C) Novell/SuSE
>>>> (D) Redhat
>>>> (E) Sage (not the system administrators guild :))
>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. But you still did not answer the question. You gave me a list
>>> of some companies, some of which focus on FOSS-based technologies,
>>> and others which to my knowledge do not.
>>>>>> Are you suggesting that none of these companies required significant
>>> capital to develop the software that is the core of their
>>>>>>> I think what Paul is pointing out is that while these companies do
>> significant capital they do not require software patents to
>> it. Your point (as I understood it, please correct) was that software
>> patents are needed to recoup/justify this capital. The above
>> seem to be some of many contradictory examples.
>>>>> They are just companies that use large amounts of capital. They do not
> need patents to make the majority of business happen, you need a
> feasible economic model and customers. Some may be in possession of
> patents but most of their business is in the delivery of customer
>> That is all.
But I was not asking that question either. (Note: I am a mathematician
as well as a computer scientist, so I try to be very precise in my
language. If I say X I mean X, not F(X). <g>)
David had earlier said:
> I certainly do, just check out the oil cartel patent portfolio some
> time... It's just with software the effect is particularly nasty and
> visible because there's still significant capital required for
> real-world engineering, unlike software development (and of course
> unless you begin to need significant capital to overcome patent
> licensing constraints... This is how patents can be used to raise the
> barrier to market entry for new players by established players.
I am arguing to the contrary: I suggest that significant capital is
still required for real-world *software* engineering, regardless of
I never argued that one cannot build and run a business without
leveraging the borked patent system. I obviously believe this to be
the case, as I have done it myself five times.
P.S. List admins: your "downloadable version" of the list archive at
http://www.linux.ie/pipermail/ilug/ is empty. I suggest you
double-check your pipermail install. Also, how about local search
function, as one cannot guarantee the periodicity of Google crawls of
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!