On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Niall O Broin wrote:
> Hardware assisted RAID maybe? But still, host drivers needed. Let
> me modify my definition of hardware RAID then - hardware RAID is
> where the operating system has NO involvment in doing the actual
> RAID work (it will of course have to have drivers for the card) and
> the OS sees as disks only the RAID volumes provided by the
> controller, no matter what the physical disk layout is.
It's as good as hardware RAID. The performance sensitive stuff is the
bus copy (pure soft RAID needs more bus bandwidth) and any ECC (XOR
for RAID-5 usually, afaik). If that performance sensitive stuff is on
the card, who cares whether management is done on a card CPU or a
host CPU? Same difference performance wise (and i'd rather have it in
my OS where it'll get broader testing).
> So you can use the not very well tested Promise Linux driver (if
> there is one for that card) or md without hardware assistance. I
> know which I'd use.
Indeed, but MD will gain support for offload in time.
Wasn't arguing for the use of some weird oddball RAID driver. Just
pointing out the promise SX4 /hardware/ is very interesting, and as
good as hardware raid (even if linux MD doesnt yet make use of it).
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul at clubi.iepaul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Crime does not pay ... as well as politics.
-- Alfred E. Newman
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!