LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
Email to...
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

[ILUG] SSH bandwidth usage.

[ILUG] SSH bandwidth usage.

Kieran.Tully AT acm.org kieran.tully at gmail.com
Wed Mar 30 17:21:39 IST 2005


On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:51:25 +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh <colm at stdlib.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Kieran.Tully AT acm.org wrote:
>> A conscientious network user would install a sniffer to measure how
much of the
> > network traffic they were responsible for. Of course you'd need more than one
> > to get a fully representative picture of the network usage.
> 
> sniffers arn't terribly useful for gauging how much traffic you're
> generating. Interface counters are a more reliable, and far easier tool

If it was me I'd look of what proportion of the total traffic I was
responsible for,
rather than local interface totals. Though admittedly your sniffer
would have to be
well-placed to tell you anything useful in a switched network (barring
MAC spoofing
/ARP poisoning etc.).

> Depending on the quality of the NAT device, the actual recourse the
> resource utilisation can be tiny, but it is there and can add to what
> the network administrators have to manage. To facilitate the SSH
> connections they might have to lengthen the timeout period on that state
> for example - which definitely will increase the ammount of memory they
> need and so on. (Or of course they can just tell you to use keepalives).

Granted.

Speaking of which, I have a persistent ssh connection setup to a
remote server, which
stays up indefinitely. When I initiate the connection from a different
local server, it times
out. Both servers run Linux and OpenSSH. The same firewall is in the
middle in both
cases, but I don't want to fiddle with it.

Apart from the TCP keepalive settings and the ssh socket and
application level keepalives (various handled in /proc, sshd_config
and ssh_config) is there anything
else I should check for differences?

Not critical, so I haven't had a chance to do a detailed analysis.
But if anyone has any suggestions for the "obvious" thing I've
probably missed...
-- 
Kieran Tully, Software Developer and Tenor
Reply to Kieran.Tully AT acm.org
http://kieran.tul.ly  http://www.cs.tcd.ie/~tullyka



More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell