On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:58:26PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Kieran.Tully AT acm.org wrote:
> > > A conscientious network user would install a sniffer to measure how much of the
> > > network traffic they were responsible for. Of course you'd need more than one
> > > to get a fully representative picture of the network usage.
> >
> > sniffers arn't terribly useful for gauging how much traffic you're
> > generating. Interface counters are a more reliable, and far easier tool
> > :)
> >
>> Without using sniffers like ntop, what's the best way to track bandwidth
> usage based on port on a simple Linux router? For bonus points, what's the
> best way to track bandwidth usage based on source IP?
>iptables?
John Looney did stuff with iptables logging before.. once you
have a chain, it counts the packets that traverse it.
L.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mail.linux.ie/pipermail/ilug/attachments/20050330/17c0da80/attachment.pgp
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
