On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> I download glibc and change some source. I redistribute this code subsequently
> (for money or otherwise).
>> As I understand the GPL (and I'd rather not get into a litigious hypothetical
> or quagmire of quotes from the GPL), I must make the source code for the
> _modifications_ also available to whoever I distribute the code to, under the
>> The following statement hasn't been tested in court to my knowledge :
>> If I link (with ld or similar) my propiatery code, to GPL code, I am not bound
> in any way to make my source code GPL.
>>> Is this an accurate statement?
No, because glibc is under the LGPL
GPL Project => If you link to it *or* derive off it, the source of the
result must be distributed
LGPL Project => If you modify the source, you must distribute the result.
If you only link the binary, you do not have to distribute the source.
This is a broad generalisation, but you get the idea.
Part-time Phd Student Java Applications Developer
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!