On 30 May 2005, at 21:16, Conall O'Brien wrote:
> Out of curiousity, how similar is dagda's main.cf to the
> comprehensive details John Tobin discussed with SAGE-IE recently[1]* ?
It has some similarities; I use smtpd_helo_required,
reject_invalid_hostname in smtpd_helo_restrictions, and
reject_unauth_destination and reject_unknown_sender_domain in
smtpd_recipient restrictions. RBL checking is left up to
SpamAssassin, and I use greylisting with a 180-second retry time and
a 35-day expiry. Some of the checks John mentions (such as MXen
inside RFC1918 space) don't seem to catch much these days.
In SpamAssassin, I use all of the standard tests, with a well-fed
Bayes db and slightly tweaked standard scoring. A variety of RBLs
are also checked.
A quick look through my mail logs shows that about 400 spams per day
are hitting the list, so the current failure rate is of the order of
1 in 2,000.
> Another option is feeding spamassassin large quantities of spam so
> it adapts to current spam trends. By feeding my spamassassin bayes
> databases on my 2 list accounts, I rarely see more than 4 uncaught
> spam between both accounts a day (despite getting 1500 spam a week
> to both accounts).
Yes, SA is regularly fed with my manually-filtered spam and ham folders.
Colm
--
Colm Buckley / colm at tuatha.org / +353 87 2469146
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!