[ILUG] The old CD thread again {RHEL this time}

[conor at discuskeeping.com]

>> It is *not* a licence to run the code, you have that the moment you
>> have the CD by virtue of the GPL, as well as ability to freely
>> distribute the CD (presuming of course, those two RPMs were removed
>> from the CD before copying).
>
> Agreed.

Yo yo, check it out.
I found references to redhat in other packages.

example is squirrelmail.
I have (had) centos4, and use(d) squirrelmail on my old domain.
the front page clearly mentions "provided by Redhat" or something like that.

I remember seeeing redhat is other places too, surely they should be 
removed, or
do those things not count? I'm asking as I do not know.

Regards
Conor.