I've been reading this for the past while now and can't believe it's
gone on so long. With all due respect, who cares! Isn't it logical
that, as stated, if you want to make a new point, top post but bottom
post if you want to address previous points. If you're interested in
the thread you'll know what the context of the posts are anyway be
they bottom or top posted. I think most peple edit their posts to keep
only the parts relevant to the points they need to address anyway.
Creating a new point within a mail at the bottom of the quoted segment
is piontless. I myself wouldn't be bothered going to the end of the
message unless it was a particularly interesting thread while I'm
On 9/8/05, Paul Jakma <paul at clubi.ie> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Ruairí Newman wrote:
>> > Only if (s)he is providing you with an answer to a question you've asked.
>> The ones with the answers tend to be the ones who trim quotes and
> reply inline. ;)
> Paul Jakma paul at clubi.iepaul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
> What a strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
> -- WOP, "War Games"
> Irish Linux Users' Group
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!