On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:41:11AM +0530, Walter Faleiro wrote:
> Hi Badger,
> There are linux systems working fine with the configuration just fine. I am
> trying to add a few more. But unfortunately I cannot see a correlation
> between the steps you provided and the working configuration. As I said it
> works fine from the host splendor, which is linux 7.2.
>>> Following is the output from splendor that is working fine
>> mail -v walter
> Subject: test mail
> .
> Cc:
> Null message body; hope that's ok
> walter... Connecting to server02.example.com. via relay...
> 220 server02.example.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
> 6.0.3790.1830 ready at Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:11:01 -0700
> >>>EHLO splendor.example.com
> 250-server02.example.com Hello [192.168.1.208]
> 250-TURN
> 250-SIZE
> 250-ETRN
> 250-PIPELINING
> 250-DSN
> 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
> 250-8bitmime
> 250-BINARYMIME
> 250-CHUNKING
> 250-VRFY
> 250-X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
> 250-X-EXPS=LOGIN
> 250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
> 250-AUTH=LOGIN
> 250-X-LINK2STATE
> 250-XEXCH50
> 250 OK
> >>>MAIL From:<root at splendor.example.com> SIZE=31 AUTH=
>root at splendor.example.com> 250 2.1.0 root at splendor.example.com....Sender OK
> >>>RCPT To:<walter at example.com>
> 250 2.1.5 walter at example.com> >>>DATA
> 354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
> >>>.
> 250 2.6.0 <200608301911.k7UJB1030730 at splendor.example.com> Queued mail for
> delivery
> walter... Sent ( <200608301911.k7UJB1030730 at splendor.example.com> Queued
> mail for delivery)
> Closing connection to server02.example.com.
> >>>QUIT
> 221 2.0.0 server02.example.com Service closing transmission channel
>
Walter, you gotta come part-way to meet me here. I need to see to output
of the configuration that we are building - the one that's failing, not
the one that is working. I'm testing things out on my machine as we go
and it's all working fine, so if something is not working for you,
you've got to say "this isn't working" and show me some output if you can.
>> Are there any other files other than sendmail.mc, .cf, submit.cf and aliases
> that I should look into?
>
Yes, as I suggested earlier, you should compare the /etc/mail/submit.mc
files on mankind with those on splendor.
The submit.mc on splendor could very well hold the answer that you are
looking for. I hadn't really thought about it, but there's probably no
reason that you couldn't remap the hostname part through that. This
would eliminate that .mailrc kludge that I mentioned before. Post that
configuration here if you can.
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!