LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
Email to...
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

[ILUG] Xen and failover

[ILUG] Xen and failover

badge badger at scattermail.com
Sat Dec 16 12:46:56 GMT 2006


On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:50:52AM +0000, Niall O Broin wrote:
> After being a long time fence sitter, I've at last started to use Xen  
> and it's every bit as nifty as the many users I've spoken to say it  
> is (including some inhabitants of this parish who use it in  
> production on some quite big systems).
> 
> I'm now looking at deploying some production servers using Xen, and  
> one major reason for this is the ability to fail over to a Xen  
> instance on a different box.
> 
> In the case in point, failover will not be seamless, as the live and  
> standby boxes will be in different data centres, but we have no PI  
> space, hence we will be failing over to different IPs. From the POV  
> of service consumers, this will be handled by relatively short DNS  
> timeouts (while failure of this application is painful, nobody's  
> going to die, so the short timeouts method is acceptable).
> 
> My question now is how to handle this from the POV of the service  
> provider, specifically the change of IP. As I see it, we have two  
> choices.
> 
> 1) Manipulate the LVM disk on the standby server after is it has been  
> updated to give it the correct IP.
> 
> 2) Run the domUs in rfc1918 space, and use iptables on the dom0s to  
> route packets as needed.
> 
> 1) has the advantage of simplifying the dom0, whereas 2) has the  
> advantage of simplifying the sync process.
> 
> Opinions? And especially, is there a 3) (or even a 4) ) that hasn't  
> occurred to me?
> 

If you are planning to use Xen's migration facility ("xm migrate") then
you're likely to be disappointed. Xen only migrates the virtual machines
memory - not it's disk image. The upshot of this is that the two dom0s
that participate in the migration need to be using the same storage (eg, 
the same SAN, or possibly NFS). I can't see how you're going to get this
to work if the dom0s are in different data centers. 

BTW I'm flying blind here - I've never actually tried Xen migration,
I'm just going by the user guide.

- badge



More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell