On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Thomas Bridge wrote:
> On 1/31/06, Rory Browne <rory.browne at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Linux/Unix admins are generally more expensive to Pay, because it is a
> > more specialised area. On the flipside, a single Linux admin
> > administrating (lets say Samba) can replace multiple windows admins.
>> Which assumes that's desirable, even it is true.
>> Depending on the importance of your IT systems to your business (or at
> least the perceived importance of said systems) you may very well want
> more than 1 IT administrator to cover your ass in the case of
> sysadmin-under-the-bus syndrome, or
> sysadmin-gets-offered-more-money-to-work-for-google syndrome.
While Intel/AMD have been comoditising hardware, managers/proprietary
software vendors are comoditising people.
Pay top dollar for one serious machine
Buy lots of cheap machines and cluster
now works for sysadmins too, with many of the same advantages. Let's hope
the administrative overhead of coordinating many sysadmins scales horribly.
If windows sysadmin gets any easier to parallelise we'll be washing pots
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!