Colm MacCarthaigh <colm at stdlib.net> writes:
> If all desktop computer hardware contains DRM, then by implication there
> would be zero market for DRM-free hardware, so there would be no problem -
> since noone would care.
Not true. There are only a handful of companies can that manufacture whole
desktop PCs at reasonable prices. An agreement could be reached between
them to only sell hardware with non-user-controlled-DRM. This can happen
whether anyone cares or not.
> > You're suggesting is that software licences should stand back and rely on a
> > plan that is guaranteed to fail.
>> How is it guaranteed to fail? Would the source code suddenly become
> unusable? Would I suddenly become unable to run that code elsewhere?
I explained this. There would be no "elsewhere".
> You are upset about *hardware* limitations. Something which has nothing
> to do with the software the GPL is licensing. It's not an appropriate
> place to tackle the problem.
The GPL is written to give all recipients of GPL'd software the freedom to
modify the software. That freedom is a dud if the software cannot be run
after modification. It would be negligent if the GPL did not try to prevent
being a dud.
Ciarán O'Riordan, _________| Support free software: join FSFE's Fellowship
http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ | & encourage others to do so: http://fsfe.org
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!