>should these 302s be included in
>the site's statistics in order to get more accurate results?
More accurate than what? If you're allowing proxies cache your files (a
Good Thing (tm) ) then the stats you have today are, depending on what you
report, a pale reflection of reality.
http://www.analog.cx/docs/webworks.html is a good article discussing the
problems around web stats. Chocolate teapots and all that
Paschal.
On 28/03/06, ilug-request at linux.ie <ilug-request at linux.ie> wrote:
>>> On further recollection, I wonder should these 302s be included in
> the site's statistics in order to get more accurate results? A 302
> NOT followed by a 200 or 304 on serverb isn't currently counted, but
> it is realistically a view of the file. Is there any kind of
> consensus about this?
>
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
