Oops, I can't even tie my own arguments together:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, paul at clubi.ie wrote:
> Arg: The "Use false-advertising to generate hype" slight of hand. DKIM will
> have /no/ effect on spam at all. Most spam will have *valid* DKIM signatures,
> if DKIM is widely checked, just as most today most valid SPF mail is spam.
>> Because then the message is already delivered. I don't want my slow Eircom
>> DSL link filled with thousands of messages that are not real.
>> Then you have the problem of co-ordinating policy between user and provider.
And of course, given first argument, you'll /still/ be getting those
thousands of emails. But now you have that state co-ordination
problem on top of it.
Yay!
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul at clubi.iepaul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Hope is a good breakfast, but it is a bad supper.
-- Francis Bacon
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
