[ILUG] Somewhat OT: Dynamic vs. Static NAT?

[Giulivo Navigante]

Braun Brelin wrote:
> Hello all,

[..]

> Any other major reason to use Dynamic vs. Static NAT?

I think they have two different objectives,

static nat maps on a one-to-one basis:

(example 192.168.1.1 -> 151.1.1.1)

dynamic nat maps on a group basis:

(example 192.168.5.1 -> IPs_POOL)

which one is correct depends on what you need, what is your practical 
case of use?