[ILUG] on the MS ISO standard thing (fwd)

[Gareth Eason]

Justin Mason wrote:
> A friend who works with NSAI writes:
> 
>   'The important thing is that ilug put together a letter. Any software
>   companies [they] can get on board should also do a letter.
> 
>   The most important reason for objecting should be that the standard
>   significantly overlaps with an existing ratified standard.'
> 
> 
> http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections lists plenty
> of those.
[snip]

	   Hi,

	Does the ILUG, as an organisation, wish to put a formal letter in
expressing their concern regarding the potential failings with this process?

	Can the committee and concerned members please contact me directly, or
the list and let me know. I appreciate that time is of the essence and
am happy to draft a letter - but I would not like to send one as from
ILUG without a mandate from the members.

	I'm going to head along to the Long Stone this evening as well, so
perhaps I'll catch up with a few interested parties there.

	Thoughts?

	Best regards,
	-->Gar