Exactly, if more people are tied to this standard, they are tied to
the application which runs on what? So it does directly affect the
pontential for linux take up.... anyhow, don't want to add too much to
this thread, but suffice to say, I second the idea that ILUG sends a
letter and I can help if needed.
AJ
On 1/25/07, Kae Verens <kae at webworks.ie> wrote:
> AJ McKee wrote:
> > I would be in favour of ILUG sending an objection. I very much think
> > its the right, correct and proactive thing a LUG should do.
>> especially as I presume this 6000 page document would be difficult or
> impossible (and undesirable) to implement any time this century in Linux (or
> any other operating system that doesn't already have a Microsoft Office suite).
>> --
> Kae Verens
> Senior Programmer for webworks.ie
> work: http://webworks.ie/> blog: http://verens.com/> kfm: http://kfm.verens.com/>
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!