| Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:32:52 +0000
| From: "Rory Browne" <rbmlist at gmail.com>
|
|[ ... ] if the #! line says /bin/sh, then any bourne
| compatible shell should suffice. If not then [maybe]
| a bug report would be in order.
if the script's authur wrote ‘#!/bin/sh’ then yes,
the author _said_ any Bourne(/POSIX?)-ish shell should
work. but _saying_ that, and _meaning_ that, or even
realising that that is what saying that means, are
very different things! I've seen far too many scripts
which are clearly specific to bash(1) that start that
way .... I'm guessing because /bin/sh being a link
to ‘bash’ is(? was?) fairly common, and (not guessing
here) far too many script authors have no idea what
they are doing. (plus, of course, there's always just
the simple mistake.)
cheers!
-blf-
--
“How many surrealists does it take to | Brian Foster
change a lightbulb? Three. One calms | somewhere in south of France
the warthog, and two fill the bathtub | Stop E$$o (ExxonMobile)!
with brightly-coloured machine tools.” | http://www.stopesso.com
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!