I thought I'd deleted that email. I didn't mean to send it. After
spending the day headscratching, googling, yahooing, and RTFM-ing I
realised my problem about half-way through writing that email. I
though I'd pressed the delete button - obviously not....
I had a catch-all iptables rule ( iptables -A INPUT ), just for the
purpose of doing an (iptables -v) and getting the packet/byte count. I
found that the counters in the header line ( Chain INPUT ( x packets y
bytes ) ) didn't match what the byte/packet counter for the rule had
It turned out that I had iptables enabled for a while before adding
the rules, so traffic in this period was reflected in the header line,
but not of course in the rules that it would have applied to ( if the
rules had been in place in the time ).
On Jan 14, 2008 12:46 PM, Rory Browne <rbmlist at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone
>> I haven't used iptables much, but I've recently started using it to
> monitor traffic.
>> I checked it today and found different values for
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!