Yeh, I figured, just needed some reasurance.
As a thought on this, what will the big CA companies do now? Will they
allow re-signings on existing customers certs without charge? Or is this
something that they do anyway? i'm really only passively acquainted with
this whole area in practice.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Luke Ashe-Browne wrote:
>>> I have an ssl cert on my web server i've been running for over a year
>> and a half (dapper drake) and this should remain unaffected?
>> libssl 0.9.8a, I won't have to patch and regenerate?
>>>> Yes you're right, again the affected list :
>> Systems which are running any of the following releases:
> * Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty)
> * Ubuntu 7.10 (Gutsy)
> * Ubuntu 8.04 LTS (Hardy)
> * Ubuntu "Intrepid Ibex" (development): libssl <= 0.9.8g-8
> * Debian 4.0 (etch) (see corresponding Debian security advisory)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: http://getfiregpg.org>> iD8DBQFIKr1oKOTSgrG1k6wRAhrzAKDBndsebNSE9DZo0l1jY64xiaWv9gCgzZP9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!