Having used Xen (briefly) and OpenVz I would say that OpenVz is better
for the setup you describe as
1) Your resources are limited and you will benefit from the speed of
sharing the same kernel.
2) You are obviously running all your services on the same OS now, so
you should be happy enough to keep running everything on the
same/similar OS.
OpenVz is straightforward to use, easy to backup and easy to create new
containers.
When you get a new physical server OpenVz has live migration (which is
very simple to configure).
/KB
kae at verens.com wrote:
> On 07/20/2009 02:21 PM, Kevin Philp wrote:
>>>> Any advice on which option to go for? Xen or KVM - KVM seems to be the
>> favoured option if you read the Ubuntu docs but the few people I know
>> in the industry use Xen.
>> I use OpenVZ myself, which has the advantage that all the virtual
> servers share the same kernel so it's faster, and the disadvantage that
> all of the virtual servers must be based on the same operating system
> and distro.
>> kae
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
