Hi,
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Mark Dennehy wrote:
> if you said publicly what he said in court, the would have very, very,
> *VERY* solid grounds to sue you for defamation; and into users by stating
> that the majority of P2P downloads are illegal;
I don't wish to defend the devil itself here, but is that really untrue?
Do we have any reason to think it is untrue? You may argue that it has not
been proven true, but that doesn't mean it is false -- you're escaping on a
technicality. I'd be pretty surprised to find that free software and other
freely distributable materials outweighed all the copyrighted movies and
music being passed around by P2P (a vague term). Perhaps I'm wrong?
Does this house deny the right of people to defend their copyright against
illegal infringement?
Gavin
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
