On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 15:12 +0100, Gareth 'bigbro' Eason wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>> On 12/10/10 17:38, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
> > The media are very good at NOT reading the decision properly but grabbing one or two keywords and making big headlines.
> >
> > Did UPC actually win?
> >
> > I think not.
> >
> > http://www.michele.me/blog/archives/2010/10/11/is-the-upc-decision-a-victory/> [snip]
>> Unsurprisingly, I see today's Metro has an article stating that U2's
> manager is calling out to the Irish government to enact legislation
> immediately to provide retribution for such a case.
>> Everything I've read in the print media regarding the case thus far has
> been incredibly biased - it's almost as if they have some agenda or
> vested interest. Articles that I've read thus far (for example [1]) on
> the topic consistently appear to imply or outright state that the
> judicial decision (which merely upholds due process) is in fact an
> endorsement by Ireland of piracy - which is rife (provably wrong proof
> given) and destroying families (no proof given) and compounding
> Ireland's image overseas as a haven for piracy (no proof given and
> starting from an invalid premise in any case.)
A journalist's perspective:
Big Music has a clear vested interest in this case. PR flaks, U2
managers and others will have been made available as soon at the
judgement was ready to give their opinion - or spin.
Paper needs ink,, and it usually needs it in a hurry as the deadline
looms. I doubt there were many spokespersons from say, the EFF or other
organisations, who were willing to give a contrary viewpoint.
So are you really surprised that the newspapers reported one view?
Offer to write a contrary column for one of the weekends, say for the
Saturday Irish Times. They'll probably carry it, just for the
controversy it will stir in the letters columns.
>> I fully expect a knee-jerk reaction to be at least mooted by our
> government who may see it as low hanging fruit, and unless any
> legislation is thought out and properly debated before being passed into
> law I anticipate it will have far reaching impacts on perfectly
> legitimate uses of the internet and freedom of speech through internet
> services. I certainly do not want to see this happen, and I don't think
> you should either.
>> Best regards,
> -->Gar
>>> [1]
>http://www.independent.ie/national-news/courts/music-giants-fail-in-bid-to-block-illegal-downloading-2374660.html>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/>> iEYEARECAAYFAky1vmcACgkQK36C50PvIR+ePwCbBMfqnEqNM/PGhNx8EdsqJbPJ
> lGUAn2+X6enidwWUQWAFPk9SUyiyQbih
> =oPCj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Gerard Cunningham
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!