Hi Esdras,
Very true on the tool aspect. But with Nagios' ability to integrate I
don't think it'd be too much trouble to merge a graphing tool with it
(though I'd need to do a bit of research :S ).
I'll take a look at Groundwork. With so many public institutions in
America cutting back on budgets it might not be an option, but it would
be a good baseline to look at as far as manually integrating open source
components in order to provide the equivalent features.
You're definitely correct in a monitoring tool being a "life-time baby."
That's why I've made a point to make my Nagios configuration files
self-explanatory from the beginning, so that someone with little
knowledge of Nagios (or system and network monitoring tools in general)
can pick up where I left off with a simple general overview of config
file structure and config file syntax. I know that I'm likely not
perfect in making things easy to pick up by another admin, but I
definitely try.
Ryan
On 2/25/11 11:33 PM, Esdras Neto wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>> It was one of my reasons to choose zabbix, I didn't want to have more than 1
> tool to look after, since we don't have many It resources.
>> I've never used, but Groundwork looks very professional and I "think" is
> nagios based with graphs and the configuration stay in a database, like
> zabbix.
>> The really thing in my opinion is deploy the monitoring tool as simple as
> possible to be easy to look after it, since it's a "life-time baby".
>> Regards,
> Esdras
>> 2011/2/26 Ryan Frederick <ryanrfrederick at gmail.com>
>>> Hi Esdras,
>>>> I've toyed around with Zabbix as well in the past couple of years, but I
>> agree with you in that I prefer Nagios over Zabbix for the simple reason
>> of being able to write a program to check anything you wish with Nagios
>> as long as it can return a string and an exit code. The one thing I
>> like about Zabbix is built in graphing, but I know the same thing can be
>> achieved with Nagios via integration with cacti and/or mrtg (Oklahoma
>> State University currently uses mrtg).
>>>> Ryan
>>>> On 2/25/11 11:23 PM, Esdras Neto wrote:
>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>>>> For sure it's not a easy decision, since they have "almost" the same
>>> features, you can see in the web site bellow a list that could help you
>>> decide.
>>>>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_network_monitoring_systems>>>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_network_monitoring_systems>I
>>> have just deployed zabbix, it's a pretty good tool that has a very active
>>> community. But one thing I tell you, my favorite tool is nagios... simple
>> to
>>> configure and just works.
>>>>>> Good look in your new job :)
>>>>>> Regards,
>>> Esdras
>>>>>> 2011/2/26 Ryan Frederick <ryanrfrederick at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Okay, so I might be bringing up a tired and much debated question
>> here...
>>>>>>>> I'm going to be heading down to Stillwater, Oklahoma in a week's time to
>>>> start a sysadmin job in the telecommunications department at Oklahoma
>>>> State University. One of the things they expressed to me that they
>>>> would like is a monitoring system for their servers and networking
>>>> equipment (they're currently using custom ping scripts). During my
>>>> interview I described my experience with Nagios since I've used it
>>>> extensively on the server side. But with my new job mostly involving
>>>> networking equipment I'm pondering OpenNMS a bit.
>>>>>>>> With my very limited experience with OpenNMS (none essentially) I'm
>>>> wondering what would be best to implement in a more network-oriented
>>>> side of a server and network equipment environment. I'm thinking I
>>>> could achieve the same results with OpenNMS by using Nagios with the
>>>> check_snmp plugin, and I'd like to monitor some more specific things on
>>>> the servers that the telecommunications department has (such as disk
>>>> space, status of certain processes, etc), things I know Nagios can do.
>>>> Could OpenNMS do the same thing? Better perhaps? How difficult is it
>>>> to transition from configuring Nagios to configuring OpenNMS?
>>>>>>>> Hopefully I'm not opening up a big flame war on this...
>>>>>>>> Ryan
>>>> --
>>>> Irish Linux Users' Group mailing list
>>>> About this list : http://mail.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug>>>> Who we are : http://www.linux.ie/>>>> Where we are : http://www.linux.ie/map/>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!