[ILUG-Social] RE: [ILUG] Re:[OT] Commission seeks views on pr ivacy legislation

[Anders Holm]

Brian,

you seriously not only lack humour, but also seem to believe that you are
superior, for some inexplicable reason. Simply asking RTE to cover your ass
is just plainly silly. If you'd have any evidence to further your case, why
not share that instead of being a pissant? To me it seems that you're only
interested in this thread as a means of trying to show your superiority (
which I fail to see anyway )...

> Call it a great big fat lemon if you wish, but I have requested the

Don't like lemon's... And I'm not American either, if that's what you're
referring to...

> pertinant information from RTE, so that is the extent of what I can
> reasonably do from my terminal right now, this you may regard as

Terminal?? Poor sod....

> insufficient, but if you wish to pick up my tab for the afternoon
> I will of
> course satifsy your claims for more backup than hearsay on this matter.

What tab? You in the pub? With the farmers then supposedly? Might explain
you're ravings then.. If I'm proven wrong, I don't mind saying I was wrong,
how about you?

> Dispite the fact that this tangent has nothing to do with the topic, one
> thing you do learn when modding is that people will take you up on almost
> anything for any reason, thus instead of arguing the merits of
> lack thereof
> of the topic in question said topic degenerates into nonesense claims for
> recompense regarding proof (which I have already requested)

Ok, so here we go again, this obnoxious use of a perfectly functioning
language, degraded to muck.... And the insidious claims of "modding"... If
you ever were a moderator, you'd also have learnt that people would like to
see proof of claims made. And don't say I'm wrong with that as well...

> [Your not the
> moderator here, AFAIK anyway. Where you taking debate lessons in school
> possibly? Or]
>
> Is this some sort of joke... the humour fails me... I'm sure it

Sure it does, nothing else was expected either.

> makes sense
> to you, and no such discourse in discussion usually leads to kiddies with
> their handbags, being surley and demanding 'information' in this instance
> thus negating the possibility of loosing their argument and perhaps being
> exposed to not being quite as infallable as they would like to think they
> are, but that is just the opinion of this former mod not gospel.

The opinion of this former PostMaster is that e-mail is wasted upon you. I
never claimed to be "infallible" either. I've had my share of bouts here as
well, and I've also been wrong in this forum as well. As for "handbag" I'm
more curious of what you keep in yours. If you intend to mean I'm childish
because I tend to vigorously claim that you are wrong, it's because of your
own childishness. By being completely unable to give a straight answer and
defending your own stand point, you show a complete lack of "adulthood"....
Being an adult mean that you'd actually take responsibility of your own
actions and not ask others to cover your ass when you've said something
stupid.

> [ are you possibly an aspiring politican? There's more than Irish
> decendants on this list.]
> yawn.

Why am I not surprised of this extremely adult response?

> [Where is this public record? A pointer in the form of a URL will
> do me just
> fine, thank you...]
>
> Like I said I have asked RTE, RTE keeps records of it's broadcasts, thus
> when one asks for records from a public body, those records 'assuming they
> are available' are said to be public.
> QED.
>
> [blah blah blah]

Exactly... Loads of air and nothing substantial as usual.

> Yes I'm sure again you think you are quite right, however there is an area
> of divergence here, as I don't.

We'll see at the end who is wrong and who is right. Interesting to see a
"former mod" displaying such a lack of being an adult. So, how come you're
_not_ a moderator anymore? Maybe there is a connection?

//Anders//