Re: [ILUG] libz vs libgz and suse

From: Andy Ferguson (ilug at domain moil.demon.co.uk)
Date: Thu 08 Apr 1999 - 06:40:59 IST

Next message: poneil at domain jps.net: "[ILUG] Win98"
Previous message: Andy Ferguson: "Re: [ILUG] Linux Box for mini-LAN"
In reply to: Caolan McNamara: "[ILUG] libz vs libgz and suse"
Next in thread: Caolan McNamara: "Re: [ILUG] libz vs libgz and suse"
Reply: Caolan McNamara: "Re: [ILUG] libz vs libgz and suse"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, 7 Apr 1999, Caolan McNamara wrote:

> Does suse install the standard libz as libgz ? Could someone check
> for me.
>

libgz* are in /usr/lib while libz* are in /usr/X11R6/lib.
All are same version (1.1.3) and size but they do not appear to be linked.

Andy Ferguson
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sysop MOIL BBS +44-1247-273357
andy at domain moil.demon.co.uk

Next message: poneil at domain jps.net: "[ILUG] Win98"
Previous message: Andy Ferguson: "Re: [ILUG] Linux Box for mini-LAN"
In reply to: Caolan McNamara: "[ILUG] libz vs libgz and suse"
Next in thread: Caolan McNamara: "Re: [ILUG] libz vs libgz and suse"
Reply: Caolan McNamara: "Re: [ILUG] libz vs libgz and suse"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:07 GMT