Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi

From: Bernard Tyers (btyers at domain snet.wit.ie)
Date: Thu 22 Apr 1999 - 21:24:40 IST

• Next message: Bernard Tyers: "[ILUG] Was : Re: pine filtering Now: Mail filters."
• Previous message: alan509: "Re: [ILUG] Network Neighbourhood off a Linux box"
• In reply to: Miles: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi"
• Next in thread: kevin lyda: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi"
• Reply: kevin lyda: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi"
• Reply: Raymond Kelly: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi"
• Reply: Jimmy O'Regan: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi - Waving white flag"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Bernard Tyers. B.Tech.Elec. Mail: btyers at domain snet.wit.ie, Web: snet.wit.ie/bbt

> <heresy>
> Anybody use joe as an editor?
> </heresy>
Yes I have to agree with miles here(even tho we disagree ALOT..AK?), joe
is cool. does what you want has help when you need it.

BTW has anyone ever uded lde for writing code?
We have it on eagle (our ultrix server...cranking 24/7).
It's got crazy commands like ",6" to save...",6c" to save and exit..
mad even worse than vi..(bernard puts on his Firemans suite and takes a
deep breath!)

Also have Pico..that's nice and simple..

rgrds,
...bernard..

• Next message: Bernard Tyers: "[ILUG] Was : Re: pine filtering Now: Mail filters."
• Previous message: alan509: "Re: [ILUG] Network Neighbourhood off a Linux box"
• In reply to: Miles: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi"
• Next in thread: kevin lyda: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi"
• Reply: kevin lyda: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi"
• Reply: Raymond Kelly: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi"
• Reply: Jimmy O'Regan: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi - Waving white flag"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:08 GMT