Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi - Waving white flag

From: Robert Sweetnam (sweetr at domain indigo.ie)
Date: Fri 23 Apr 1999 - 14:32:05 IST

Next message: Stephen Shirley: "Re: [ILUG] The "I've given up on that" Samba Q"
Previous message: Lars Hecking: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi - Waving white flag"
In reply to: Jimmy O'Regan: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi - Waving white flag"
Next in thread: Colm Buckley: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi - Waving white flag"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

just emacs, vi is evil
----- Original Message -----
From: Jimmy O'Regan <Jim.Regan at domain lit.ie>
To: <ilug at domain linux.ie>
Sent: Friday, April 23, 1999 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi - Waving white flag

> Just out of interest, does anyone else use *both*?
>
> (Does this qualify me for flames from both sides?)
>
> J.
>
>
>
> --
> Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug at domain linux.ie
> http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription
information.
> List maintainer: listmaster at domain linux.ie
>

Next message: Stephen Shirley: "Re: [ILUG] The "I've given up on that" Samba Q"
Previous message: Lars Hecking: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi - Waving white flag"
In reply to: Jimmy O'Regan: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi - Waving white flag"
Next in thread: Colm Buckley: "Re: [ILUG] Emacs vs. Vi - Waving white flag"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:09 GMT