Re: [ILUG] make bzimage (was Re: [ILUG] Redhat 6.0)

From: Donncha O Caoimh (donncha.ocaoimh at domain tradesignals.com)
Date: Tue 04 May 1999 - 14:46:10 IST

• Next message: Justin Mason: "Re: [ILUG] flat-rate inet access"
• Previous message: Liam Bedford: "[ILUG] heheh.... userfriendly is now a requirement for jobs:"
• In reply to: Mel: "Re: [ILUG] make bzimage (was Re: [ILUG] Redhat 6.0)"
• Next in thread: Thomas Ribbrock: "[ILUG] -15? (was: make bzimage (was Re: [ILUG] Redhat 6.0))"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I'm surprised zImage worked at all. For large kernels you _need_ to
specify bzimage. It's in the docs somewhere. Even for 2.0.xx kernels.

Donncha.

Mel wrote:
>
> The bzImage idea does work because it's what I resorted to last night in a
> fit of temper but that doesn't correct the origonal problem. 2.2.6 zImage
> worked fine before redhat "upgraded" me to kernel 2.2.5-15 (wtf is the 15
> part?). When I tried to reinstall the new kernel, LILO wouldn't let me.
> Making some of the drivers modules or removing them altogether didn't work
> either. bzImage was all it would accept.

• Next message: Justin Mason: "Re: [ILUG] flat-rate inet access"
• Previous message: Liam Bedford: "[ILUG] heheh.... userfriendly is now a requirement for jobs:"
• In reply to: Mel: "Re: [ILUG] make bzimage (was Re: [ILUG] Redhat 6.0)"
• Next in thread: Thomas Ribbrock: "[ILUG] -15? (was: make bzimage (was Re: [ILUG] Redhat 6.0))"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:10 GMT