Re: [ILUG] somewhat off topic: ping and TCP/IP

From: Lars Hecking (lhecking at domain nmrc.ucc.ie)
Date: Wed 12 May 1999 - 12:55:51 IST

Next message: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] somewhat off topic: ping and TCP/IP"
Previous message: Paul Curtayne: "[ILUG] Fw: [ILUG] somewhat off topic: ping and TCP/IP"
In reply to: Harry Moreau: "Re: [ILUG] somewhat off topic: ping and TCP/IP"
Next in thread: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] somewhat off topic: ping and TCP/IP"
Reply: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] somewhat off topic: ping and TCP/IP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> I don't know off the top of my head what port 90 is for - but even if it isn't
> currently reserved for something, it could be tomorrow.

dnsix 90/tcp DNSIX Securit Attribute Token Map [CXW1]
dnsix 90/udp DNSIX Securit Attribute Token Map [CXW1]

HTH.

Next message: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] somewhat off topic: ping and TCP/IP"
Previous message: Paul Curtayne: "[ILUG] Fw: [ILUG] somewhat off topic: ping and TCP/IP"
In reply to: Harry Moreau: "Re: [ILUG] somewhat off topic: ping and TCP/IP"
Next in thread: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] somewhat off topic: ping and TCP/IP"
Reply: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] somewhat off topic: ping and TCP/IP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:11 GMT