From: Liam Bedford (lbedford at domain wbtsystems.com)
Date: Tue 02 May 2000 - 17:33:51 IST
----- Original Message -----
From: "McDaid, Aaron" <Aaron.McDaid at domain compaq.com>
To: "Ilug (E-mail)" <ilug at domain linux.ie>
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 5:27 PM
Subject: [ILUG] fixing Ilug's addressing
> I find it somewhat confusing when one
> doesn't know whether or not a reply
> to an ILUG post should be "reply-to-all"
> or just send the mail to ilug at domain linux.ie
> in the To: or Cc: fields? This would play havoc
> with my filters mind you (based on recipient, not
> subject line - anyone know how to set this up in
> Outlook 2K btw?)
What do you want to do? You can tell it to filter
on most fields... just play with the rules wizard...
There's an options for "With a specific word in the recipients address"
> Any smarter ways? Or should I wait until flying
> pigs have been created ;)
Nooooooo, not again... isn't this in the FAQ somewhere?
it's not broken. Even outlook can deal with it. Hit reply to go
to the sender, hit reply to all to cc the list. You can remove
the intended victim/target if you don't want them to
get it twice, but there's no way to guarantee that said
person is on the list (there's no blocking on posting)...
There is a URL, and David Murphy will hit you over the head
with it multiple times soon :)
--- Liam Bedford | What we've got here is, failure to System Administrator | communicate. Some man you just can't WBT Systems, Block 2, | reach... so you get what we had Harcourt Centre, Harcourt St. | here last week, which is the way 01-4170100 | he wants it
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:05:59 GMT